About your Search

20121214
20121214
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
: despite these meetings at the white house, let's just say that the weather outside in washington is still frightful. with christmas fast approaching, it will almost assuredly be a recession if we don't get a deal. sometimes even superheroes need help. that's why you have the avengers. you can talk tackle big problems to get it. the superheroes of the past may try to help to fix it. gentlemen, welcome. i'm not referring to either view is old, there is very little of this going on. but do you expect it to go on? is this what it will take for the speaker and the president to get a deal done? >> you see, the contraction of the economy up to 3%, a third of a trillion dollars in new taxes for american taxpayers, if they don't get this thing done, we are really going down the financial tubes. they were set up by the president and the congress to be so bad that it had to be solved. it behooves them to get it done. they have to do that. neil: but they don't. deadlines are deadlines, and the backup backbone if they don't get something done -- as they try to move the line on that. i wonder, congress
to the, the op-ed piece in "the washington post" this morning which susan rice talks about why she decided to submit her wii drawl letter from consideration. she writes this as it became clear my potential nomination would spark enduring partisan battle i concluded it would be wrong to allow this debate to continue distracting from urgent national priorities. were there any enduring partisan battles when you were serving in that same job? >> well, probably so but you know, what's unusual about this circumstance obviously is she had not been nominated yet and to have the little exchange that we had yesterday, she writes to the president. the president issues a statement, results in the obama administration preemptively surrendering on a war that hadn't been declared yet. you know when jim baker was chief of staff for ronald reagan, he operated on a principle that the president never loses. that you try and structure things so that the president doesn't take any unnecessary hits because you're trying to maximize the president's influence. this is an example of the white house for rea
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)